FROM THE OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE

As a privately held company, The Office of Strategic Influence is not required to publicly report on any of its operations or activities. This blog is a faint reflection of our interests and opinions. Thank you.

~ Spinboydotcom


02 July 2007

The Agenda

The theme this decade is - "The Acceleration of Agenda through Crisis". ~ Spinboydotcom





The Agenda

An Inconvenient Truth

BY DR. G. CLOTAIRE RAPAILLE

Doctor Number 1: You need an operation.

Doctor Number 2: No, you just need to relax and take these medications!

Who is right? Doctor number 1, or doctor number 2?

Well, neither! They both have an agenda.

Doctor number 1 makes a lot of money when he operates; doctor number 2 does not operate, but gets a lot of money from pharmaceutical companies to push their medication.

Today, the facts are becoming irrelevant. All information is available on the internet. The Agenda is what matters.

The Clintons have spin-doctors, experts in turning any fact to their advantage. The boycott of Israeli Universities by Britain's University and College Union has an anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic agenda. Why not boycott Syria which is being investigated by the United Nations for murdering Lebanon's former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri: "Syrian agents are suspected of killing the former finest freedom loving Lebanese journalist's Gibran Tueni and Samir Kassir. But none of that moves the far left to call for a boycott of Syrian Universities. Why? Sudan is engaged in genocide in Dufar. Why not boycott Sudan? Why? Ask Thomas Friedman of the NY Times, because of the far left agenda.

Before you consider any current topic from gas mileage to global warming, do not look at the facts. Look at how these facts are used to serve a hidden agenda. 30 years ago, the far left's big topic was "global cooling." They wrote articles explaining that "scientific evidence" (sic) was predicting that glaciers would reappear and that New York City would experience a new Ice Age. Today, the same scientists are predicting "global warming." I am not arguing about the facts but how the same data can be used to fit a hidden agenda.

Before I listen to anybody, I want to know their agenda.

Why is GM telling me that it will cost ME $1800 more per car if I want a car with good gas mileage. Why is this doctor recommending surgery; why is Al Gore (who invented the internet) so much into global warming?

The "inconvenient truth" is that all these people have an agenda, which makes the facts and the data irrelevant.